|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2138
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 15:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
2 This is not a signature. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2142
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 23:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
59 2 wars and lots of blood on my hands, maybe it was and maybe it wasnt [/quote]
59 and no wars, does that make me a care-bear? This is not a signature. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2143
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 06:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:CCP needs to set firm, concise and no-nonsense rules in order to prevent the Eve community falling into disrepute. As demonstrated by the most recent "scandal", even a misunderstood activity has the ability to show the Eve community in a negative light. The only safe way to prevent this from happening, is to prohibit, and proactively police, any form of action or activity in the EVE community that could be viewed as harassing, intolerant, or bigoted.
The last thing CCP, and the Eve community needs is attention from the gaming media displaying intolerant behaviour from community members. Nip it all in the bud.
Which part of the recent 'scandal' do you feel CCP did not understand? This is not a signature. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2143
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 06:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Aivo Dresden wrote:Malcanis, you're not objectively presenting the points. Your disgust of option 1 is just appalling and that's fine, you have your own opinion.
Don't make that so obvious though and answer every question about option 1 with "is that really what you want? REALLY?". I'm just making sure, because some of the posters here seem to be unaware that their choice doesn't reflect their stated aims. If you were looking to lose weight, and told me that you'd decided to go on an all fudge cake diet, I might well comment on that too.
So long as the fudge cake diet was about a 1,000 calories or so a day, one would lose weight This is not a signature. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2143
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 07:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Option 2, has been, is, and will be the way. This is not a signature. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2146
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 05:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Deka Ekato wrote:Personally I choose Option 2, with some added points, because there seems to be one too many defenders of E1's behaviour.
These points can go something along the following lines :-
- Using in game mechanics to PVP / interact with others is acceptable - Griefing players in / out of game is not acceptable - Someting about not abusing the petition system concerning Griefing, ( I don't know how to put this coherantly ).
IMHO all griefing, in/out of game is bad.
It hurts the victim and such behaviour spoils the reputation of the playerbase and CCP.
As such :- - Scamming is ok ( not good, simply ok ) - Griefing is unacceptable So suicide ganking for it's own sake is now not allowed?
If you need to ask the question, you would not understand the answer. This is not a signature. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2146
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 07:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Deka Ekato wrote:Personally I choose Option 2, with some added points, because there seems to be one too many defenders of E1's behaviour.
These points can go something along the following lines :-
- Using in game mechanics to PVP / interact with others is acceptable - Griefing players in / out of game is not acceptable - Someting about not abusing the petition system concerning Griefing, ( I don't know how to put this coherantly ).
IMHO all griefing, in/out of game is bad.
It hurts the victim and such behaviour spoils the reputation of the playerbase and CCP.
As such :- - Scamming is ok ( not good, simply ok ) - Griefing is unacceptable So suicide ganking for it's own sake is now not allowed? If you need to ask the question, you would not understand the answer. I'm asking the question in order to help some people see what a selective and ambiguous ruling this is. Let's put it right up against the new rules. Evil_ganker01 decides to go out miner bumping. He finds the first random target he can, and starts bumping the guy out of the belt. The miner is of course upset. But Evil_ganker01 just keeps on bumping, maybe even talking a little smack or hurling out some insults at the same time. Eventually, our poor miner LOSES IT. He starts screaming and cussing at Mr Ganker. According to CCP Falcon and to players who support this idiotic ruling, "the line" has now been crossed. Mr Miner has "lost control of his emotions," and it's REALLY obvious, too. According to CCP Falcon and the players who support this policy, NOW is the time to stop messing with Mr. Miner. So what happens when, after all this, after "the line has been crossed," Mr Ganker decides "well what the hell" and suicide ganks the already visibly upset miner? Slippery slope is slippery.
I refer you to the answer I gave earlier.
You may also wish to look at some of the explanations Malcanis has provided over and over again.
This is not a signature. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2146
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 10:34:00 -
[8] - Quote
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:That was never OK and I called it years ago that something would eventually happen. CCP as far as I am concerned is handling this better than I expected. But, nothing has actually changed? You're still allowed to go out and "be a sociopath" for as long as it doesn't leave CCPs ass flapping in the wind, at which point they will ban you for damage control, either temporarily or permanently depending on how much they like your face. This is the way it has always been. They've done a good job of pulling the civil service "illusion of action" trick as if they've changed something and wrapped it all up neatly, when really all they did was ban one person. If the point of Ripard's 12 blog crusade was to ban one individual he didn't like, then well he can claim victory, otherwise it has achieved nothing.
What may well have happened (permanent ban) to Ero, simply made it clear to some folk, (hopefully not many would have behaved the way he did) was to make very visible a line in the sand up to, and beyond which it would be foolish to go if one wishes to carry on playing Eve Online.
But to be honest much of the, 'but I don't understand' reminds me of a three year old child continuously saying, "yeah but" when told something by an adult.
If you are so unsure and worried about to what is permissible, then Hello Kitty will be glad to occupy your playtime. This is not a signature. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2148
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 17:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
If CCP whacked Ero for what is commonly termed, 'gross misconduct' then it would mean that his behaviour was considered to be so beyond the pale that he forfeited the right to a warning. This is not a signature. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2151
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 17:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:To go one further, just because YOU are say a race, if YOU say things that are considered hating on that race, you can be racist too you know.
as to the rap song thing, I live in the southern US, I hear a LOOOOOT of ignorant dumbasses trying to justify them slinging that word all over exactly like that.
AND lol at "look at my avatar" thats priceless right there "Race" does not exist except in the human mind, science has proven this, circa early 2000s. The only people who concern themselves with 'racism' are racebaiters like Jesse Jackson and the Entire Democratic party of the United States, who like to also vilify all sane fiscal policies as 'racist'.... who like to blame Bush for things like the Hurricane Katrina response, while ignoring the mayor of that city being a complete dumb ass. Yeah, there might be some vestiges of the ***, but they sure as hell don't play EVE. So just stop with your trite and tired bitching.
I would accuse you of bringing real life politics into the form, but you have not, fantasy politics are fine. This is not a signature. |
|
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2163
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 21:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
Amyclas Amatin wrote:I believe that CCP needs to make a public statement on what they did to Erotica 1 and why, because the speculation and public reaction over this is never going to end.
No one cares apart from us few forum warriors and the very few people involved with the CODE thingy This is not a signature. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2166
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 08:05:00 -
[12] - Quote
[quote=Mr R4nd0m]Why hasnt this been moved to Jita Speakers Corner like any other post would have. [/quote
Why has this not been locked. it is the same few folk saying the same thing over and over again. This is not a signature. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2168
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 09:32:00 -
[13] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Why has this not been locked. it is the same few folk saying the same thing over and over again.
Yet you're still reading...
Not any more, just unsubscribed to this thread. This is not a signature. |
|
|
|